It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Curiosity compels people to seek new experiences and adventures. Nowadays, researchers and travellers could visit and explore every part of the globe. This may bring about some merits and demerits which are going to be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, going to far sides of the globe opens a new journey for adventurers and creates a good experimental condition. Firstly, many enthusiastic explorer look for genuine places to visit and have an experience about there. Different natural places which are cannot be available before because of different such as rash climate conditions or limits of human being are waiting for exploration. For example, a climber can easily reach the top of Everest Mountain that is impossible before 1970’s that is achieved after usage of oxygen tanks and some medical drugs. Secondly, scientists could work wherever they want. It wasn’t possible to work in the deep parts of oceans due to lack of technical devices but nowadays they can dive the deepest part of oceans even more perform experiments by using modern diving devices. Hence, the opportunity that arriving all parts of world afford the scientist and adventurers to work and explore even in the marginal points.
On the other hand, environmental pollution ensue from the flock of people to this natural beauties. Visitors might leave their litters or directly destroy the untouched nature by human hand. For instance, plastic bottles, bags and remnant of some devices are detrimental for nature as well habitants. Many oceans turtles strive from the plastic materials which left by researchers or other humans. Thus, activities of people could be harmful for untouched places.
In conclusion, despite the fact that traveling to any parts of the globe become obtainable, this has its pros and cons. In my opinion, it contains many opportunities and serves a new horizon for people to explore and learn from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s essay. On the one hand, going to far sides of the globe opens a new journ...
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral places which are cannot be available before because of different such as rash...
^^^
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, a climber can easily reach the top of Everest Mountain that is impossible befo...
^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to this natural beauties. Visitors might leave their litters or directly destroy ...
^^
Line 8, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or people to explore and learn from it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69056720298 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599358974359 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5818409285 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15687023125 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477857831778 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327846123748 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911275293925 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215768468895 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.