The key to solving the environmental problem is simple: the present generation is willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental degradation is rife today. With our planet submerging in the perils of pollution
and other hazards, this situation has worsened over a while. Some people think that the present
generation is aware and ready to incline towards a less comfortable life in the wake of
environmental protection. However, I don’t think it’s entirely true and partially disagree with this
opinion. In the paragraphs to follow, I shall put forth my point of view on the topic.
It has not escaped the attention of anyone that today’s generation has become extremely
insolent towards the environment and, as a result, are bearing consequences to their own
devious ways. People today have considered environmental issues as a pick and choose topic and
care to notice either only for their college projects or on some specific days such as World
Environment Day. It is a very unpleasant and, unfortunately, a very common sight when such
critical issues are seen getting slipped out of the mainstream and not paid much attention to.
Moreover, modern-day technologies have significantly contributed to the ailing status of our
environment.
During very recent times owing to certain calamitous consequences that have vigorously jinxed
our climatic conditions, the youth is seen waking up to the harrowing shrieks of our unhealthy
planet. Global warming, poor air quality and consequentially, the drop in the health statuses of
people have brought this reckless generation to senses, and some people and confederations
have started taking actions to protect the environment now. However, the major proportion of
the world is still spotted taking the environmental deterrents and the threats as a subsidiary
issue. This attitude has trembled the foundation of environmental safety. The usage of hazardous
chemicals, pollutants in the water bodies and the dangerous frequencies of digital devices are
devouring the globe.
Hence, in conclusion, we can say that the present society is not really ready to give up on the
unhealthy ways that they consider as convenient ones, and in the process cause inconvenience
to our environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48203592814 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08694831241 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.119601617 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.066666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120546378359 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405076260262 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548277619119 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286752772482 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461552620289 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.