Large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Working system of many Multinational companies in this material world has forced rich to become richer and poor to become poorer by providing them salaries according to their designation where CEO and managers are paid more compared to labors, which in my perspective, injustice for employees.
To commence, There are several reasons why lower graded people should be offered good salaries. Helpers and operators play pivotal role in industry for which they ought to be valued. To explicate, companies without labors can stand no where in the market as only director and executives cannot run whole company. Workers need to be persuaded work under pressure if management department thinks to possess any target. Some worker not only do hardships, but also they are passionate about specific working style which an engineer cannot think at that level despite having degree or certificate. For instance, Rewarding them with handsome salary hike at frequent time period to accomplish goals would be an effective way to tackle this issue inferiority complex among staff.
On the contrary, it is irrefutable that to make all people work, Ideas ought to be generated. Therefore, handling numbers of workers of the company and maintaining smooth activities with consumers, it becomes profoundly significant to influenced by CEO or managers. If workers hunger cannot be fulfilled, they may feel inferiority complex, thus, can be resulted coming together as a UNION where company may have to face numerous complaints.
In conclusion, although an organization needs management to run it, the working population are willingly rewarded with the hike in salaries as per their passion and skills to accomplish it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Multinational companies in this material world has forced rich to become richer a...
^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...te, companies without labours can stand no where in the market as only director an...
^^
Line 6, column 382, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hus, can be resulted coming together as an UNION where company may have to face nu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as for, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39552238806 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8234214388 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679104477612 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6627847451 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12256597725 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436985628853 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310435209802 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707226334191 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025786910425 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.