These days, humankind’s relentless pursuit of economic growth is driving many wildlife species to the verge of extinction both on land and under the ocean. This phenomenon undoubtedly could be attributed to several factors and this essay would put forward some feasible measures to tackle these potential problems.
There are two main reasons behind animal extinction. One of these is illegal hunting and overexploitation. According to a study by the Center for People and Nature (PanNature), the number of wild elephants currently in Vietnam is only 120, a 16-fold decrease in comparison to 1990 because of the poaching for ivory. The other reason for animal disappearance is the loss of natural habitats due to human activities such as deforestation, marine debris, and oil spill. Such activities would destroy shelters, food sources and affect the health of the animals living there. This leads to population decline, and extinction becomes more likely. For instance, forests that are home to wild species are being cut down to make way for factories and buildings.
However, the aforementioned causes could be dealt with several solutions. One approach is the policies and regulations of the government. They should organize guards to protect animals against hazards and have drastic measures and harsher punishments for unlawful hunting and environmental destruction. According to Vietnamese law, the act of poaching wild animals will be punished by a criminal penalty of between VND 500 million and VND 2 billion or a prison term of between 1 and 5 years. Moreover, it is critical to raise people’s awareness about wild animal conservation. They should be educated to boycott products made from certain species such as rhinos, elephants, and crocodiles.
To recapitulate, while the impact of human exploitation causes significant damage to wildlife, this can be addressed with a variety of approaches.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42474916388 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01628484988 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635451505017 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1238230376 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208388200328 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602734770258 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568920870647 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110327851834 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531253762111 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.