Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animal from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The issue of whether governments and citizens should pay proper regard to endangered animals or the imperative requirements of human beings remains a subject of intense debate. In my opinion, i tend towards the viewpoint that the preservation of rare species is more critical.
There are several reasons why it is necessary to discuss human’s matters. Over the past few decades, we have seen an alarming increase in the number of factories, which is arguably a primary cause of various environmental problems, especially air pollution. Under these circumstances, without the drastic measures imposed on the factories’ waste disposal control by governments, it would significantly impair the health of the public. On top of that, the dramatic amount of toxic waste is dumped into the sea from not only industrial areas but even daily activities of residents, which considerably contributes to the death of multiple sea creatures. Thus, it can be argued that the significance of mitigating the social issues is incontrovertible.
On the other hand, it is perhaps even more vital to prevent endangered species from extinction, there are two main reasons. First of all, the relentless rise in the frequency of deforestation, at the rate of 40 football fields every minute according to Global Forest Watch, results in the serious loss of animals’ natural habitat. Biodiversity, therefore, is substantially afflicted, and as a result, human beings will inevitably face its consequences, from food-scarce crises to the imbalance of ecology. Secondly, only by conserving species in the potential danger of dying out can our later generations be provided the opportunities to see their incredible features. All in all, there is a direct connection between protecting animal species and the possible benefits for human beings.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against whether nations and individuals should mainly focus on the danger of rare animals or the matters of the community. I contend that the preservation of endangered creatures ought to be the urgent priority, however.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 89
- Some people say government should give the health care the first priorities, some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the tax payers' money. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animal from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings.Discuss both views and give 89
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes Argue both sides and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 79
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...bject of intense debate. In my opinion, i tend towards the viewpoint that the pre...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45731707317 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22741892185 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640243902439 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3467321576 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192862813565 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560319601304 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459614912662 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106271459383 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395261529526 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.