Over the past few decades, some of the disease appeared to be incurable for the human since the medication was under developed and unavailable for people. However, people nowadays are able to manage this dire situation by the potent vaccination. In my view, I support the side that people do have the right to refuse to immunize their children, and my opinion would be shed light on as follows.
It is mandatory that parents should have their children injected by the vaccines to fight against the fatal disease as this is the optimal way to get immunity. To demonstrate, in the past centuries, certain diseases are lethal to the human beings. Ever since the advanced medication was introduced and invented, these fatal illnesses are nearly eradicated recently. In this case, people could get immunity which is capable of fighting against the destructive disease. As a result, immunizing the children is fundamental and the parents should be obliged.
On the other hand, people do possess the right to defy the compulsory vaccination in that over dependent on the immune vaccination is adverse to the human. In the event that people over rely on the medical vaccines, it would inflict detrimental influence on their immune system. The physician and the scientific researcher suggest that once people over depend on the vaccines rather than relying on their own immune system, their immunity would probably decline and would be incapable of withstanding nay disease afterwards. It is necessary for the immune system in the human body to adapt to the illness, so it could strengthen itself and therefore, improve self-immunity.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, despite the fact that mandatory immunization is favorable to children in terms of preventing the formidable disease, I firmly believe people have the right to refuse to vaccine their children because it is vital that human immune system should adapt to the disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
Over the past few decades, some of the disease appeared to be incurable for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14873417722 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75333732908 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2190750333 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352301265553 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130129971195 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105515728473 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226788901652 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489479690687 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.