In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available. Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages
It is true that the number of fast food restaurants is growing every day. Some advantages certain to arise due to this phenomenon, nonetheless, I think that the advantages of this progress will outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are some advantages of ubiquitous distribution of fast-foods. First of all, people will not suffer from hunger any more. It is well-known fact that famine was common phenomenon in the past, however, fast food changed this pattern. In other words, due to the low cost and availability people can afford it. For example, more than a third of adults in the United States - about 84.8 million people ate fast food on any given day between 2013 and 2016. Besides, another reason behind fast food popularity is its yummy taste. To put it differently, the concentration of sugar in junk food exceeds all norms, therefore it is so delicious and in demand. As an example, it was reported that average American consume fast food 3 times a week because of its taste.
On the flip side, fast food consumption can cause various diseases. Firstly, fast-foods can contribute to obesity and weight gain because fast food contains a lot of cholesterol, carcinogens and toxic fatty acids which can cause detrimental health problems. For example, scientist Michael Greger find a positive correlation between high body mass index and the intake of fast food. Moreover, diabetes is another problem that can be caused by excessive consumption of unhealthy food. By the way of explanation, fast food can contain high concentration of sugar, namely, even salads and fresh juice can contain sweeteners. In addition, there are saturated fatty acids which are associated with atherosclerosis and heart diseases. Thus, scientists claim that eating fast food can be risky.
In conclusion, nowadays fast food chains in profit because of some positive sides, however, I suppose that ubiquity of unhealthy food brings about more problems compared to any advantages it might bring
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, i suppose, i think, in addition, in conclusion, by the way, first of all, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14769230769 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82693135635 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1827079258 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9444444444 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258348705318 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859625773023 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418421429342 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173534422886 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361448063207 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.