Due to the lack of specialised hospitals and educational institutions in the rural areas, it is suggested by some individuals that newly fresh out graduates should be send to these areas for few years. Others disagree with this notion and say that choice of work should be left on these individuals. This essay intends to discuss both views as well my opinion in the subsequent paragraph. I, however, side with former view.
There are many pros of working in the rural areas. Firstly, rural areas are having a lack of these facilities, the arrival of well-trained doctors and teachers in a countryside would provide a better education and health care services. This would significantly enhance the living standard of these individuals. Secondly, this policy is also likely to preventing rural inhabitants from moving into big cities in search of school and medical services. As a result, overpopulation can be avoid in large urban areas. Finally, since there is a lack of workforce in a rustic area. So, it will be a great opportunity for new teachers and doctors to translate their theoretical knowledge into practical which can bulid their confidence level to deal with people.
On the other hand, some people say that newly graduates are able to decide where they want to work. To begin with, everyone has a right to choose their workplace that they feel comfortable with. Mostly individuals like to live and work in a place which is very close to their family. Therefore, such type of enforcement violate their rights and they will be unable to work in a proper concentration. Moreover, if the government force these graduates to work in a rural area than these occupations become less attractive. Consequently, fewer students would choose such type of profession.
In my opinion, government can provide a better remuneration to these individuals by providing higher wages or other incentives to stay in a backward area. It develops not only rural areas but also boost the economy level as of urban areas.
To sum up, it would be an ideal step by sending the best doctors and teachers into rural areas by government. But the authority should offer financial and non- financial schemes to these individuals to show their willingness go to such areas and work with full energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sent'?
Suggestion: sent
...hat newly fresh out graduates should be send to these areas for few years. Others di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81233718222 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2648041455 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9523809524 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09523809524 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263180411159 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730860980206 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569312963057 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139106331906 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372560318602 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.