In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recently, people have two distinct notions about how the salary was paid around the world. Although enormously high wages can be beneficial for the country, I personally believe that government should regulate the levels of salary.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people support the extremely high salary paid for a group of society. First, it is inevitably admitted that by giving a higher level of salary, corporations can attract more and more talented and skillful workers. For example, Google, a large technology group, has been already to pay a huge remuneration package to draw their employees. Second, in order to boost the producibility, extremely high salary is the main motivation for labors to work dramatically hard. As a result, people have more money to complement their family and the government can raise more resources to self-develop infrastructure systems and social services by imposing on individuals and corporations income.
On the other hand, it seems better when the government controls the boundaries of wage paid for labors. First, if authorities narrow the gap between the salary of employees and employers, society will maintain the equality and therefore recontribute the social welfare from the rich to the poor. Consequently, it also lessens the citizen’s dissatisfaction which causes a lot of evil and frauds. In addition, the limitation of wages facilitates to eliminate hunger and reduce poverty and every single one has a chance to enjoy a better life. Hence, to some degree, the economy would grow stainable.
In conclusion, while extremely high wage can encourage workers to put all their efforts, it is essential to establish the correct balance the salary payment scheme by governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e salary payment scheme by governments.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3345323741 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98280400199 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6756992182 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200935000561 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650968783112 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054579996775 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115259722737 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058447151222 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.