Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically friendly. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?”
Nowadays, to adapt the requirement, people should collect many kinds of foods from another places where are far away. This essay will shed some light on both pros and cos of eating the local food.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that to eat the local foods brings some drawbacks. In fact, there is not enough nutrition for people staying in the places where can not farming and ranching under extremely weather conditions. This leads to the fact that people have risk with any serious diseases especially children. Some place, children, for example, have not enough essential foods to eat such as Sumali, Bolivia, Nigeria in Africa area. In addition, consumption the local foods causes imbalance distribution aspects. This can pose a threat to foods crisis with big cities. As a result, communities in downtown areas have extreme condition with dramatical rise of cost of living.
Nevertheless, there are also several benefits of local consumption with foods. As far as the first merit is concerned, using the local foods makes reduce the total cost of foods such as transportation fee, maintenance cost. The foods is always fresh and nutritious, which can guarantee the health for local people. The second positive aspect is concerned, to adapt the local food requirements, the native people should increase self-sufficient abilities to reduce the dependence to another places and creative many job. This is a factor responsible for stimulating development of local economy.
In conclusion, although some people think that using local foods brings some benefits, it still also has any drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'farm'
Suggestion: farm
...ple staying in the places where can not farming and ranching under extremely weather co...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ation fee, maintenance cost. The foods is always fresh and nutritious, which can ...
^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...pendence to another places and creative many job. This is a factor responsible for stimu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, nevertheless, second, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23643410853 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73201929923 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.307697378 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313847535684 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10884019905 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740711742202 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219516453723 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478538423398 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.