There is no doubt that governments should do their best to improve the quality of life of its citizens. However, while some people believe that authorities should focus only on economic development, I would argue that there are other progress types which are equally significant.
To begin with, those who say that economic progress should be the most important goal for a country highlight the undeniable advantages of advanced economies, which include better life quality, higher salaries and life expectancy. Economic growth brings prosperity, which many people strive to achieve. For example, the average salary in Russia, which by many is considered to be a developing country, is much lower compared with the average salary in the UK, a developed country. If, on the other hand, a country is not able to develop economically, the citizens will suffer, as there will be an increase in unemployment and unhappiness.
However, I believe that although a rise in GDP is important, it should not be the sole focus of a government, as technological progress is at least as vital as an economic one. The reason for this is that new discoveries allow us to develop as human beings and have the capacity to significantly improve our lives. For instance, if governments of the USSR and the USA had thought only about making profits, people would never have gone to outer space, and we would not have had some technologies, such as GPS.
To conclude, whereas economic progress has its positives, such as bringing prosperity to a country, I would argue that technological development is also crucial, as it may lead to further improvements in people’s lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... outer space, and we would not have had some of the current technology, such as GPS. To ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, at least, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07942238267 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92244454884 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4272650477 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.7 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252313841807 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900051810002 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599823165126 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143892951466 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050006038519 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.