Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In the contemporary world, accompanied by the proliferation of technology, many governments concentrate on developing the economy, leading to the divergence of opinion on whether or not it is the most significant purpose. While a number of people believe that the administration’s highest priority is economic growth, I am inclined to the view that there are other concerns should be taken equally into consideration.

On the one hand, economic growth leads to several beneficial outcomes for many countries. Firstly, thanks to the investment of developing the economy, there are more job opportunities for employees, allowing citizens to earn living and have a higher living standard. For example, people in many European countries are having better social welfare than ones in developing countries. Additionally, the average income of labor increases, resulting in the higher national revenue that governments have by imposing taxes. Furthermore, this budget may be generally used to improve infrastructural and enhance the quality of transport systems as well as bridges. The availability of this may solve many impressing issues such as traffic congestion as well as natural disasters. Another point is economic progress broadens more chances for people to acquire wide knowledge due to international trade and cooperation, especially for the businessman.

On the other hand, there are other factors needed to take into account to ensure the sustainable development of a healthy country. In term of politics, the more stable it is, the more focus on the development of citizen’s life. A good illustration is people in Syria are suffering from the difficulties and shortage of food because of wars and the unstable political state. In addition, from the social science point of view, environmental concern plays an important role in the development of a country. For example, the pollution causes the depletion of natural resources such as fossil fuel and raw materials, which are one of the most influential factors on the developing nations’ innovation. Last but not least, ensuring social security and people to obey the rules are the responsibility of governments, encouraging people to work effectively and efficiently. In consequence, the combination of economic growth and the above concentrations would bring desirable results for a country’s environmentally sustainable development.

In conclusion, for the aforementioned discussion, it appears to me that economic growth, albeit having many advantages, should go along with equivalently different sorts of progress such as politics, environment, and social benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...leading to the divergence of opinion on whether or not it is the most significant purpose. Whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s are having better social welfare than ones in developing countries. Additionally, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1050, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironmentally sustainable development. In conclusion, for the aforementioned di...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68592964824 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4248774962 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5865302285 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.117647059 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165203809358 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496169067216 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384694489239 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10295159511 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146812842004 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.