In this day and age, companies have increasingly produced more and more high-level sugar products, which is the primary culprit of sugar-related illnesses. Some people hold a stern belief that sugary food should be put at an exorbitant price to dissuade demographics of society from purchasing sugar-sweetened products. This essay will argue why the rising price of those products is not effective despite the potential perks that it brings about.
To begin with, some people believe that should they make sweet food more expensive, the overall well-being of consumers would be developed. This is for the reason that the extravagant price acts as a mental hindrance to make them reconsider buying sugary food. Thus, consumers will ignore them and spend money on other types of products. For instance, confectionery has been selling at roughly doubly higher price than the others in Japan. As the result, it is Japan that accounts for the lowest rate of disease in relation to sugar intake. In summary, some people believe that the expensive prices of sweet commodities will affect customers’ psychology and reduce the ratio of sugary illnesses.
In spite of the advantages associated with rising sweet food prices, the idea is unnecessary. This is because people who have had a sugar addiction will keep paying money for satisfying their cravings regardless of how exorbitant sugar-based products are. Additionally, a diet that contains an abundance of sugar is because of not only the producers but also consumers who have the salient responsibility for choosing types of food. Indeed, there have been many recorded circumstances of consumers who have been obese due to consuming sugary commodity although it has an exorbitant price. Overall, the idea that increasing the price of the sugary product is entirely anecdotal as well as ill-informed, and it could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for society.
In conclusion, this essay argued that people who suggest increasing the prices of confectionery are having a flawed understanding of the factors leading to sugar-based illnesses and the effects of what they believe. In my opinion, hindering sugar-related sicknesses does not merely fall into companies, but the society itself.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in summary, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31741573034 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94234433155 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1619080491 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2507852483 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790117468268 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514689599676 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153027784775 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559301130551 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.