Many museum charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages.
it is true that some museums only be accessed with paying entrance fee while others free of charge. Although paying money to access these buildings have several drawbacks, I think that it is more beneficial for the government and our cultural heritage.
To begin with, there are some disadvantages to charging people to enter the museum. Firstly, because of the price, some people not interested to go to museums. For them, it is more luxury than necessary. For example, India Weekly culture journal revealed in 2011 that due to high charge fee to enter museums %70 of tourist are a foreigner. this result in less attraction toward cultural areas. secondly, students have a hard time due to lower-income which results in very little knowledge of essential areas in their town. Moreover, this affects their historical knowledge indirect way.
On the other hand, to preserve, maintain and keep quality on high levels, it is important to make some regulations on entry. First of all, price is a decisive matter for people only travel these areas for tourism. these people often damage parts or items in museums. For instance, The Explorer in Turkey stated in 2017 that %70 of old greek historical sites damaged or stoled due to free of charge access towards these places. secondly, these museums need special care due to their unique structure or very old historical pieces they have. For this job, the government need to hire specialists in these fields which require more payment.
To sum up, even though paying these important cultural areas have some disadvantages, I strongly believe charging them help government to preserve and maintain more effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that some museums only be acces...
^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... due to high charge fee to enter museums %70 of tourist are a foreigner. this re...
^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...seums %70 of tourist are a foreigner. this result in less attraction toward cultur...
^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... less attraction toward cultural areas. secondly, students have a hard time due to lower...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...le only travel these areas for tourism. these people often damage parts or items in m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e Explorer in Turkey stated in 2017 that %70 of old greek historical sites damage...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... of charge access towards these places. secondly, these museums need special care due to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08791208791 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58681723261 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6246056763 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236106288822 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772503750104 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624323721946 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1403553095 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427903680311 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.