Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In this contemporary era, the government is channeling resources into developing museums and historical sites at both quantity and quality. Unfortunately, this effort is of little avail in attracting local people. It is emerged that more tourists find these places interesting than indigenous people. This essay will throw some light on the reasons for this problem and suggest a couple of effective solutions.
To commence with, there are two main rationales for local people rarely visiting historical places. The first one is associated with financial aspects. Many of these tourist attractions require visitors to purchase an entrance ticket. In terms of citizens, it is useless to spend money on this purpose as there are more fundamental needs and investments that they have to save money for, such as food, bills, and education. Besides not wanting to squander money, indigenous residents are hardly fascinated by museums or historical sites. These people might have a misconception that they are familiar with all information and knowledge at these destinations. As a result, they have no idea of visiting them.
In the same line with the about discussion, there are some solutions that the authorities can implement to tackle this issue. Dealing with money, historical sites could be assessed without charge or at a discount rate for residents. For example, Danang and Quangnam citizens can visit Hoi An Ancient Town without entrance fees, whereas tourists are requested to buy tickets. Besides, the administration of museums and historical destinations can establish some advertising projects about interesting and novel information and features to significantly attract publicity. In this way, indigenous people might change their conception and make a decision to pay a visit to these places.
To recapitulate, I reckon that there are two main reasons that diminish local people's interest in historical destinations: entrance tickets and familiarity. The government can address this problem by canceling or reducing fees for their people and run attractive programs to stimulate more people to come to these places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, whereas, as to, for example, i reckon, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49544072948 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96365832453 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.672775801 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354366774945 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103127327291 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707278000359 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215912690005 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486146025141 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.