Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, there are widely different schools of thought on whether scientific studies should be supervised by authorities or privately - owned enterprises. In my point of view, I believe that such responsibility should be handled by both parties for the sake of humankind.
On the one hand, there are ample justifications why the aforementioned duty should be carried out by the state. First and foremost, the authorities could ensure the security and morality of these studies. As a case in point, researches involving nuclear power should be implemented by government, since it is possible that privately - owned companies may produce and sell nuclear weapons for other, especially terrorism, resulting the instability in our society. Moreover, the primary priority of research of the government is improving human lives; therefore, they could enable people to approach reliable knowledge from their studies. Meanwhile, the ultimate aim of private corporations is profit; thus, they may provide inaccurate information that manipulate people’s shopping behaviour.
On the other hand, profit - driven organisations have their own strengths to conduct scientific research. From financial perspective, by investing money in science - related studies, those companies are able to ease the pressure on the government's coffers. As a result, the state would have more expenses to address other social issues such as education and healthcare. Moreover, the participation of private enterprises may lead to a higher chance of breakthrough in science, enhancing individuals’ living standards. For example, the invention of Windows operating system by Microsoft corporation facilitates people’s accessibility to the virtual world, which, in turn, helps to update the latest information and broaden horizons.
In conclusion, due to their own merits, either government or profit - oriented organizations play a vital role in taking part in scientific research
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atest information and broaden horizons. In conclusion, due to their own merits, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79238754325 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21948433217 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6682710419 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236620767034 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724037582365 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467103311286 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133917915098 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456958232866 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.