Whether or not passing an educational course in university to achieve a precious job has become a controversial issue among many people. While some claim that people would not be prosperous in their career just by passing an academic course, others believe starting work after finishing high school to get skill can be more beneficial to gain for a job. This essay will discuss both sides of views in more detail. Furthermore, it will investigate why passing a technical course can be useful for everyone, but why it depends on what the individual wants to choose for future occupation.
On the one hand, some contend passing a course of university education is vital to get a desirable job. Indeed, they believe that a university certification had been always a significant criterion which is considered by employers. Besides, people who graduated from university often are known as a genius and smart person that would be able to overcome any obstacle in their career and life. For these reasons, many people imply that think that having an educational certification is the only path which leads to the success road.
On the other hand, opponents of this view assert that gaining experience in the work environment is superior since it can help them to achieve a job while not successful or not tend to finish their study. Additionally, while an individual incline to work in an occupation which does not require obtaining a specific theoretical education, starting work with the aim of getting experience might outweigh rather than participate in university. For instance, many prospering persons like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are two reputed entrepreneurs, did not finish their study. Hence, many think that the probability of getting a job via learning a vocation has a higher rate.
Completing a course of the university against gaining experiences from practical work, to achieve and guarantee a good career, has become a topic of debate among people. This essay discussed why university license has a significant role in employment but why a technical or practical experience facilitates this route. In my opinion, considering persons' purpose, each of these views can be profitable which ones of these views can be profitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not passing an educational course in...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not passing an educational course in univer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12295081967 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90433045943 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2870351818 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270993977034 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888902376235 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705007280552 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161009772777 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255702437897 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.