many people think that to become a successful specialist, it is better to choose a career early in life and never change it later. Do you agree or disagree?
There are differing views with regard to getting a stable job. While many people believe that doing one type of job during a whole career life is the best way to become a successful expert in the chosen field. I strongly disagree with this point of view for some reasons.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that doing same jobs brings employees many considerable benefits. Firstly, getting work early after graduate and staying in the same work for life help workers to gain deepest knowledge and experience which not only allow them to rapidly move up in their career ladder but also earn fully respect from the organization for their professionals and contributions. Accounting, for example, is a kind of job that always requires for long-experienced staffs and an accountant who works for a company for long is highly appreciated and has huge promotion opportunities to become a head officer or even financial manager. Secondly, high job satisfaction in term of working environment will easily be obtained by working in the same position for the same company since workers get used to with workplace atmosphere, colleagues, and boss which in turn place great contribution to people successful career.
On the other hand, there are several disadvantages of having a job early and keeping it for the rest of working life that should not be ignored. Actually, people may not know their best working capacities when they are just graduated. Therefore, only by trying and changing jobs, they can discover themselves and figure out their best suitable career to persuade. In fact, there are many people who succeed in the fields that are not their first choice such as Tam Dang, a very famous successful marketer in Vietnam, who first started his career as an accountant. Additionally, changing jobs creates great chances for employees to learn different knowledge and experience that broaden their horizons for a successful career and to open their relationships by getting more colleagues which all may not be obtained by doing the same position.
In conclusion, although some pros of having the same job for life, it is more reasonable for people to not regularly but sometimes changing their career as a way to explore themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ws with regard to getting a stable job. While many people believe that doing one type...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ecome a successful expert in the chosen field. I strongly disagree with this point of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'gain the deepest'.
Suggestion: gain the deepest
... the same work for life help workers to gain deepest knowledge and experience which not only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06216216216 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81731186862 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9098409766 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.076923077 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4615384615 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3846153846 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175917169035 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733633545643 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554380576584 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130318678782 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352074814406 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.