Many people think that to become a successful specialist it's better to choose a career early in life and never change it later. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Over the years mankind has recognised the need for the right choice of future work. As a rule, society believes to be the most faithful to choose a profession at an early age and follow it until the end of life. Although the crowd prefers to constantly change occupation, I am of the opinion that to become a quality specialist a person needs to be engaged in one activity.
On the one hand, constant search of self is good and necessary, because a person develops all his life. Firstly, individual learns a new craft and the spiritual world is transformed. Also, It allows them to find new acquaintances and connections and close comrades, who. are useful in the future. For example, my father spent all his conscious life searching for himself in various spheres, and achieved great results. Thus, a good specialist stands in one place and finds application for their talents everywhere
On the other hand, career growth is crucial for people who are attentive in their successful future. Furthermore, self-sufficient person follows a single goal throughout their career to achieve a quality result. Actually, to continue a strong career, body needs to deepen knowledge in the chosen sphere. For example, one of the greatest players in the NBA, Lebron James, from the age of 10, tirelessly went to his goal, repeatedly became the best player in the League. Hence, the direction of development in an individual’s life should not change for the desired result.
In conclusion, I believe that when capitalists are engaged in one activity they have a better chance of reaching heights. At the same time do not forget about development in field and move to a meeting for a happy future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
Over the years mankind has recognised the need for the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...nd connections and close comrades, who. are useful in the future. For example, my f...
^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'stand'?
Suggestion: stand
... great results. Thus, a good specialist stands in one place and finds application for ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93356643357 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80683002374 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8744696934 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118441089336 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343908779817 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323469889224 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689117958208 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290941483925 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.