Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
Worldwide competition is dramatically accelerating due to the establishment of globalization. Hence, some argue that workaholics would gain significant benefits over those who prefer an eight-hour schedule. Perspective, I believe there would be more pros by allowing oneself to work harder.
On the one hand, it is clear that long working hours can cause various issues. Firstly, employees who spend 12 hours per day at the workplace are likely to lack quality family time. As a result, children would suffer from inadequate parenting care, which eventually results in hazardous and long-term effects. Secondly, overwhelming plans means that workers would be tired, which leads to poor health. Sedentary lifestyles, which are increasingly integrated into today’s firms, have generated diversified ailments such as obesity, eyes-related issues, and mental disorders. In other words, if ones blindly overwork themselves, the outcomes will not be promising.
On the other hand, there are tremendous benefits for those who can adapt to such schedules. One of those merits would be the fulfilment one ripes from dedication to the job. As people devote themselves to their careers, the value they create would respectively skyrockets, leading to more satisfaction. Another main advantage is the capability to produce high-quality, innovative and breakthrough products. Elon Musk, for example, has utilized a 16-working hours schedule, which ultimately helped him and his team successfully commercialized space rockets.
To conclude, while overworking could bring detrimental influences on an individual, its benefits are considerably more rewarding, especially for those who can adjust to the conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rwork themselves, the outcomes will not be promising. On the other hand, there are tremen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'skyrocket'
Suggestion: skyrocket
...he value they create would respectively skyrockets, leading to more satisfaction. Another ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18319587836 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3650016736 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133444872765 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408382657437 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301226799418 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793978258552 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223393120175 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.