Many students leave high schools without knowing how to manage their money. What are the reasons, and how can they improve their understanding of financial management?
Monetary skill has been an important life skill in people’s daily life. However, it is pointed out that many students finishing their high school without the ability to manage their finance. This essay will discuss the causes of this phenomenon, followed by possible strategies to allocate the problem.
The lack of capability to manage their money among students is mainly due to the following reasons. First of all, the inability of school education to impart relative knowledge to students is the primary reason. Because high school regards equipping its students with abundant academic knowledge as its top priority, it seems useless to include any financial related courses into their curriculum system. In addition, students also could not acquire enough practice opportunities to hone their financial skills in their daily life. As high school students are deemed to be immature to look after their own money, it is unlikely for them to acquire suitable opportunities to practice their financial management skills.
In order to solve the problem, two effective methods should be adopted. To begin with, the financial management course should become one of the compulsory subjects in high school education. With the better understanding of relative monetary knowledge, students will able to look after their own finance efficiently. Moreover, parents should give their children more opportunities to practice their financial management skill. As such skill can be constantly improved and upgraded in students’ daily life, the continuous practicing will tremendously improve students’ money management ability.
In conclusion, the missing of relative education and no practice opportunities are two reasons of the problem, while students’ understanding could be improved by arranging financial management courses and provide students with opportunities to practice their corresponding skills.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 146 200
1. doesn't need to paraphrase the content in the conclusion
2. duplicated word/words, like: skill/skills, opportunities, ...
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 283 350
No. of Characters: 1582 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.102 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.59 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.822 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.032 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.369 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.551 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79505300353 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01855731217 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537102473498 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.390359665 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386271900921 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150925236536 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107227551561 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249110216738 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642289196018 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.