Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Thanks to the advanced development of technology, people can live longer than the past. Some people think human should not live for a longer length of life. I believe whether to live long or short is the individual’s choice. However human always tend to live longer, and with the technology development, it is a blessing thing for having longer life of human.
It is not clear to say people who can live longer than others in the past can be given happiness. Since human have less investment such as computer, TV, and other electrical devices which can provide entertainment for human in that year. In the past the longer a person can live, the more boring he or she may has. Moreover, because of the lower technology development, a longer length of live always means living with bad transportation, fragile house and none medical treatment.
However, some people said it is painful for human to live in modern society nowadays, since our society has become more like a ‘throw-away society’, where the amount of garbage is increasing daily. And human’s body are damaged by serious pollution and garbage which produced over generations. But we also enjoy more conveniences than the past. And the fast speed development of medical treatment can help people to overcome illness which was fatal few decades ago. Nowadays, people accept enormous information daily and have lots of thing to do, various place to visit. People are urged to live longer so that they can create more things which colorful their rest of life.
Overall, since the modern society can provide a more convenient, stable and enjoyable live style for human, living for a long time is obviously a better choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... since our society has become more like a 'throw-away society', where t...
^
Line 9, column 541, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...ept enormous information daily and have lots of thing to do, various place to visit. People a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03169014085 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77737006309 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55985915493 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.047939453 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263766222704 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913030364777 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731579709587 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183329618837 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504296275067 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.