Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others.
Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a wide range of courses that universities offer and the fees can vary from least to more expensive. In many cases, most relevant degrees that are needed by society pay more compared to others. Since there is a demand on this type of degrees to assist the society, people reckon that the government should fund the students taking up the course and irrelevant courses to remain paid by students themselves which will bring more disadvantage.
People always want equality, if the government provide funds for courses needed by society, parents will all end up letting their kids take up these funded courses. That way, they will be freed from the burden of costly tuition fees. If this happens, the government will not have enough resources to support the increasing number of students taking up the course. Furthermore, parents are removing their children’s freedom to choose their own path.
On the one hand, most students have the will to decide which careers to choose, so, not having equal rights of support from the government will end up in a disaster as students will fight for their rights especially those who are financially inadequate to support their chosen degree and need to work part-time.
Government support must be allocated equally to all courses just like what happened in MSU-IIT where current and incoming students have the privilege of less or free tuition and a monthly allowance. This is a newly implemented law by the Philippines government which earned a great impression from students and parents.
Therefore, funding courses that are helpful for the society and neglecting the rest can only infuriate people. Instead of bringing the society in order, it will just create drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, of course, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09154929577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61973724058 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55985915493 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7185858446 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183873947146 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676051406759 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046096244884 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101954830204 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299622161667 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.