in the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, thanks to the ever-developing technology, humans have been enjoying more convenient and useful services than in the past. In particular, it is indeed easy for those to access online services which is related to shopping, working as well as communication, instead of direct contacts. This improvement can bring not only positive impacts but also negative effects on the human’s life.
On the one hand, the development of online services regarding shopping, working and interaction can be considered as good signs. The first reason for this is that they will save a huge amount of time which, in the previous period, they spent on travelling to shops or workplaces, if they use internet applications. It means that they could locate the great deal of time in entertaining activities or tourism ones. Another reason which is put forward to explain is that interacting with others through the Internet can make significant contributions to the relationship among people from various countries and cultures. For example, Facebook is a breakthrough invention where people with different cultural backgrounds can make friends together. As a result, people could expand their relationships and furthermore, could have opportunities to exposure to cultural values across the world.
On the other hand, although the development of the network can bring a number of conveniences, it also has adverse impacts on a lot of aspects of humans’ life. in fact, to maximum profits, many shops and outlets advertise their goods with the incorrect information of quality on the media such as TV, Facebook and other online shopping software. Therefore, online buyers can be strict into fade and undesirable goods. In addition, communicating with others via online services can make the relationship among humans deteriorate rapidly. Since they do not have more chances to exchange their exciting stories which happen in daily life. a good example can be seen in young generations, they have a tendency to spend more time on chatting with more strangers instead of their relatives. As a consequence, the relationship between family members would erode considerably.
In conclusion, the development of live tools in terms of shopping, working and communicating can help people make friends and save time. However, this kind of improvement should carry a good part of the blame for the problems in modern society like the deterioration of family relationship and the issues of online purchasing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... a lot of aspects of humans' life. in fact, to maximum profits, many shops an...
^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nship among humans deteriorate rapidly. Since they do not have more chances to exchan...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ing stories which happen in daily life. a good example can be seen in young gener...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37817258883 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0609063397 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4167800873 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.722222222 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175961389911 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532203069496 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425240321853 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109267394174 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246768246897 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.