In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate online without any face-to-face contact with other people. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the tendency to manage with any business distantly becomes more and more popular. People order things from online shops, work at home and communicate with other people on social media. To my mind, this is a positive trend, which allows people can not waste their time for a long distance.
When a person uses online abilities, he saves his time and can be independence from being in one place. They can move to other cities, countries and it does not influence people's life, because they are able to manage their businesses distantly. Moreover, online shopping is more comfortable for busy people. Thus, they have not to go to the shopping centre, buy and search for things, which are necessary for them. They just order products on the Internet from home or from other convenient places and wait for delivery man, who will bring the goods. For example, according to the statistics information during quarantine time, more than 65 percent of people started to use online services.
On the other hand, people have to communicate offline to be a healthy person without social disorders. In fact, if people have not had conversation face-to-face for a long time and do not go out, they can get the physical and mental health problems. In other words, people can lose the ability to speak confidently, further, some ot them start to be afraid of unknown people, others stop the communication with their friends. After long being in their houses, people became weak to various diseases, which can develop quickly due to low immunity. For instance, the survey of Italian psychologists has shown that people who work distantly are most susceptible to depression and other diseases in contrast to people with the offline jobs.
In conclusion, I can say that online shopping, studying and other activities are convenient tendency in the modern world. To my mind, people should use these opportunities correctly without spending lots of time and harming themselves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05828220859 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63695405087 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6995902864 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284156887356 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921761842867 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556872208361 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176494341137 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062568612354 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.