More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?
Relocating to the metropolises has been increasingly popular, as places of opportunity. While people claim that enhancing the standard of living and facing some major drawbacks are contemporaneous, I personally believe that the state could ameliorate city life for the average inhabitant.
Perhaps the worst problem stemming from this is the exorbitant cost of living in the city center. The citizens living in the urban area have to spend the disburse expenditure on housing, transport, and even food rather than their neighborhoods. A further problem is that residents inclined to afflict social problems such as poverty rates, violent crime in comparison with rural areas. Finally, there are the mental and physical issues caused to residents by atmospheric pollutant, traffic congestion, and overcrowded public transport system. For example, inhaling the exhaust fumes released by vehicles is the reason for the incidences of asthma and lung cancer.
Turning to possible solutions, there are various measures that governments could take to tackle these obstacles. Firstly, they could offer tax incentives for individuals' public transport expenses. Popular in the US has gained support from the policy which overlooks the bottom line benefits associated with public transport use, reduced urban congestion, and air pollution. Secondly, the government should develop provincial towns and rural areas, by transferring industries and jobs to those regions, in order to ease the pressure on major cities. The third option would be to invest money in the building of affordable housing or subsidized accommodation, leading towards the alleviating cost of living.
In conclusion, there are various burdensome problems that people have to confront in the metropolitan city. In my views, the government could certainly implement a range of approaches to upgrade the quality of life for all city residents
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | MotiurRahman | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and overbetween 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles How could this alleviate congestion What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities 30
- the graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person between 1967 to 2000 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 11
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... living in the urban area have to spend the disburse expenditure on housing, transport, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63541666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95559137079 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3069130893 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161981419974 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480796457947 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563718196157 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109231846786 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055658728536 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.