More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is positive or negative development?
It is clear that the Internet has become an important part of modern life. This leads to working and studying from home with the help of technology. This situation has both advantages and disadvantages.
To begin with, working and learning at home save time. Employees and students do not need waste time to travel on the daily basis because they do not go anywhere. On top of that, people spend more time with their entertainment and their family commitments. Another big advantage is to the environment. For example, as fewer people have to move out of their homes, less petrol and diesel is used, and less pollution is caused. Traffic congestion, which is a big problem in the cities, is also lessened. One more thing is that many people who work and study at home claim to be more productive because they are not in a loud environment or distracted by co-workers and other students. As a result, she or he may perform better her or his tasks.
Apart from the benefits expressed above, I believe there are considerable drawbacks of this tendency. One negative side is that there is the lack of communication. Because of the loneliness environment, both workers and learners do not have a chance to face to face conversations. It makes them isolated and limits personal relationship. Furthermore, working and studying alone from home can be very boring at times. When you are in a proper office and school, there is the atmosphere which keeps you going.
Overall, it appears that technology has eased our life in many ways, and this is both negative and positive development. However, I prefer to work and study at home because it gives us better results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to waste'?
Suggestion: to waste
...ime. Employees and students do not need waste time to travel on the daily basis becau...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...rkers and learners do not have a chance to face to face conversations. It makes them isolated a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, apart from, for example, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83566433566 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78607269927 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587412587413 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1753333714 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7894736842 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32790840197 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801896614914 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944523479257 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178692430838 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025832514955 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.