As more and more students enter universities, academic qualifications are becoming devalued. To get ahead in many professions, more than one degree is now required and in the future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even starting work. This is an undesirable situation.
Students, nowadays, tend to enter universities to get more and more qualifications. In fact, it is believed that the more degrees they have, the better jobs they can get in the future. However, this tendency has not only advantages but also disadvantages anyways.
On the one hand, it is wrong thought that only people who have a lot of certificates can be applied for a good job. In some cases, the skills and experience are more important than anything which can learn from books or teachers. To be specific, that is the reason students who have recently graduated from university usually find it difficult when they apply for a job. In fact, they do not have enough experience to solve the problem which they have never meet before. For example, when their job have some sudden issues, the people who has more experience will keep calm and find the way to cope with them while the ones who have less can not keep control and be scared of them.
On the other hand, having many qualifications means that they have known a lot of professional knowledge which are really useful for their work. A person who has more than one degree course is more competent and can efficiently improve the quality of work. For instances, some multinational corporation offer jobs to those staffs who have more languages degrees or masters in information technology. This improves the quality of work along with better plans for people.
To sum up, requiring more than one certificates is not always good. Anyways, in our life today , everyone have to have enough skills and knowledge to catch up with the rapid development of the world. Personally, i disagree that this trend is undesirable, i think it should be continue in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualifications'' or 'qualification's'?
Suggestion: qualifications'; qualification's
...f them. On the other hand, having many qualifications means that they have known a lot of pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... always good. Anyways, in our life today , everyone have to have enough skills and...
^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d development of the world. Personally, i disagree that this trend is undesirable...
^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...isagree that this trend is undesirable, i think it should be continue in the futu...
^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'continued'?
Suggestion: continued
...nd is undesirable, i think it should be continue in the future.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, however, if, really, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80134680135 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66508875587 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5973781806 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208651155178 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878582781518 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961133939648 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149707680695 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628107423456 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.