Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multinational companies have a responsibility toward
local communities in which they operate?
In the era of globalization, countless firms run on an international scale. From my perspective, these companies should put more emphasis on contributing to the development of the communities where they have located in several aspects.
To begin with, the prime onus that myriad multinational enterprises should take responsibility for is to preserve the environment. It is an undeniable truth that these firms have posed a serious threat to the surroundings such as releasing air pollutants into the atmosphere as well as discharging wastewater. Besides, natural resources have been confronting overuse by industrial companies. Similarly, unsustainable logging of timber for construction or paper manufacture may have serious effects on local farmers due to resultant
soil erosion and taking a death toll on the living organisms surrounding. Therefore, it is imperative for multinational enterprises not only to make a commitment to restrict the level of contaminants emitted but also to guarantee the long-standing prosperity of local communities.
Additionally, the major global companies can support the local societies by creating employment with the view of ensuring the workers are entitled to adequate salaries to meet their demands. Providing considerable jobs near residents’ houses can do a favor for the locals in terms of commuting and saving money. People can travel to work in a short distance which can save their time and money. Besides, the scheme is contributed to reducing the unemployment rate in this area, facilitating economic advancements in the long run. For instance, according to Vnexpress, the Samsung company in Hanoi has given a huge number of jobs to more than half of its inhabitants.
To sum up, it is my conviction that multinational firms have a duty that improves the standard of living in local communities in which they have conducted their operations by implementing some measures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, may, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5067114094 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34063899948 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1639467159 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215816944859 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621433205735 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613921283313 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113569017893 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669573092168 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.