New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?

Admittedly, with revolution in technology every aspect of life has changed. And, same is in the case of spending leisure time, which now has altered choices of young ones. However, I believe merits of this assertion are more than its drawbacks.

To commence with, contemporary gadgets have influenced children in numerous ways. First of all, juvelines start using computers and mobiles at early age. That means they have more time to excel in it, consequently this benefits them afterwards. As, nowadays most lucrative jobs involve the use of these modern gizmos. Therefore, people who lack these skills sooner or later are at setback. To illustrate, according to recent research, students who were extensively using computer in tender age were found to be more successful in gaining good jobs as compared to their counterparts. Hence, the present technology is assisting children to prepare for their better future.

Besides this, usually most of time is spent indoors, that lessen the risk of accidents and misshappenings. While, earlier kids used to play out and often get injured. Therefore, now guardians can keep an eye on their children and ensure their safety. Nevertheless, despite of its advantages it has some demerits as well. Firstly, it is primary cause for decline in physical activity, which ultimately is elevating the chances of distinct ailments. What is more, these gadgets are gerenally related with rise in anti-social conduct. Children now remain locked in four walls and communication become negligible. Thus, not in every case advancement is right.

In conclusion, as I aforementioned modernization is helping to safeguard children and to speed up their development. Deducing, this phenomenon seems to have lot more positive points.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...equently this benefits them afterwards. As, nowadays most lucrative jobs involve t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, first of all, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37906137184 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92615256892 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678700361011 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3724793193 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.85 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20608093436 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527585400259 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047501083009 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121495880403 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112137525793 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.