Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is often argued that celebrities acquire bigger salaries than politicians. This essay will first suggest that the main reason for this phenomenon is that celebrities confusing payment with self-worth require more money for their contribution to society then government politicians who have fixed salary regulated by law. This essay will then suggest that this is a negative development which can lead to popularization of wealthy life of elite.
Celebrities such as movie stars, footballers, musicians, TV personnel, YouTubers and so on often think that they are worthier due to their popularity and availability throughout electronic media confusing, maybe unconsciously, term 'worth' with massive salaries. Elected politicians, on the other hand, can not allow themselves gain their 'worth' through measuring political contribution to society by money. In addition, the limits of politicians to use electronic media lead to lack of their popularity and/or availability in comparison to average celebrity. According to recent research made by group of professors from Ukrainian universities our contemporary attitudes towards who deserves what pose serious moral concerns in society worldwide.
As a result, our community recognizes and supports celebrities rather than unpopular and/or unavailable politicians causing a negative effect on modern society in general. Thus, through following celebrities' social media accounts and buying the products they endorse, people contribute to the enormous wealth of elite. This, for instance, leads to economic inequity in society and can popularize the status quo of rich celebrities and billionaires.
In conclusion, these days' people should be more conscious of their role in perpetuating inequality between overpaid celebrities and politicians which are endowed with the powers regulated by law.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87732342007 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12173821978 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.058708714 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273167385232 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951282642839 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696586771335 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160263958437 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968459084806 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.