Nowadays computers are widely used in education. As a result, some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most schools and universities have already adopted computers in their teaching process. There is an assumption that computers will replace teachers in the foreseeable future and teachers will no longer be important. I completely disagree with this view and believe that teachers will always be of great importance in the educational sphere.
On the one hand, computers undeniably have a positive impact on the learning process. They help facilitate the pace at which children assimilate the information. Even though graphics and visual demonstrations have already been introduced in classrooms, yet they are still in a small number and not on a frequent basis. Computers and projectors could address this problem and serve a perfect demonstrator for what has been learned in lessons through lively images and videos. Moreover, enrichment evening classes are no longer needed, as learners who do not catch up in class could make use of online courses in a more flexible way than that of any other supplementary courses.
However, computers cannot supplant teachers for many good reasons. Teachers do not only impart knowledge to their students, but they also serve as a role model and cultivate students’ potential. Impulsive and impressionable as they are, children are vulnerable to anti-social behavior and wrongdoings. Without sufficient disciplinary and guidance, they are likely to grow into violent and immoral adults. Moreover, students need a person to chart their learning progress and offer them valuable advice. This cannot be done in a class completely dominated by computers and other such technological devices. Despite advancement in the algorithms that give computers the capacity to assessment, it is genuine advice from the people that students respect that make a real difference in their learning progress.
In conclusion, computers definitely have a beneficial impact on education. However, teachers are irreplaceable companions of students in their learning course.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57236842105 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0496738734 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1958010512 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6470588235 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180512705112 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508947905726 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408252811429 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107500983283 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275315112777 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.