Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
Luxury brands are more and more taking a fixed position in customers, especially high-class people. To me, I do not agree with obtaining all of the things with expensive price is good, but I do not oppose as well. This essay will clarify some points about the reasons and discuss whether it is a good or bad trend.
It is undeniable that human have a huge greed in term of many things. It is not negative in a specific context called development. In the past, wars, diseases and natural disasters made people have no kind of happiness more than food worry-free. Progressively, the world have been being peaceful more and more, a great proportion of human can easily afford food nowadays. When they have enough or even lots of categories of food, they start to move their eyes to updated appearance and quality of their clothes, shoes, vehicles, etc. Many upper-classes are in the same page about how well-known brands bring them positive effects. Beside the best quality and safety, popular goods help them show their style and how rich they are due to the sumptuous look under the name of the famous label.
As mentioned above, famous brands are usually bought by people with handsome salary. According to the situation, buying a popular goods can become positive or negative waves. Achieving the best things for a better life is a good one. However, the stuffs that they get sometimes are just decorations in their huge collection. The money they invest in that luxuries can be a big donation to facilitate those who do not access even food and daily needs. Vice versa, those who do not get a well-paid income but try to act as rich people are worth to put the blame on.
To conclude, the brands of great renown are the result of development and possessing them is not a step backwards but let’s be a wise shopper at least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e. To me, I do not agree with obtaining all of the things with expensive price is good, bu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook under the name of the famous label. As mentioned above, famous brands are us...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'good'?
Suggestion: good
...ding to the situation, buying a popular goods can become positive or negative waves. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, well, at least, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68730650155 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49424569478 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6995711341 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0588235294 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164028230245 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049791244771 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035351247247 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929973173764 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308384585808 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.