Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is widely held belief that the catching edge technologies such as smartphones and I-pads are able to ameliorate teenagers’ creativity and IQ, but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that gadgets are the tremendous barrier for juveniles’ development. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in the light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
First and foremost, the gadgets and computers are the most powerful achievement of mankind and they are part of young generations’ life. Consequently, teenagers use gadgets at school and at home since some of school apps and books can be downloaded here. The primary reason we have to take into consideration that the gadget apps help create the IT codes and websites. For example, students who study informatics or web-design should bound up with gadget programs since they will devise a websites and web portal. More importantly, if they prefer to create super-high function websites or web shops, they have to be creative. Also, young people are able to set up groundbreaking apps that will help to other society members.
On the other hand, apps such as a calculator and memorize can aggravate teenagers’ critical thinking and literacy. For instance, they calculate a hard math or chemistry tasks with gadget or smartphone calculator. As a result, their math skills will deteriorate and ability will demolish. Moreover, young generation uses memorize apps and these applications put an obstacle to a brain function and human memorizing ability. As a result, juveniles become the forgetful individuals and they lose the creative abilities.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that gadgets have a huge harmful impact to young peoples’ life since they wipe out their critical thinking and numeracy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ration that the gadget apps help create the IT codes and websites. For example, studen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26644736842 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05835266693 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.923097707 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140549583924 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454890121287 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386573543033 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847644181874 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018778675892 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.