Nowadays more and more children are appearing in reality shows. Some people feel it is a good trend. others do not agree.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Lately, reality shows feature a more number of children than ever before. It is believed to be a positive change by some as it tends to help children socialize easily, while others disapprove for the dangers that are associated with it. In my opinion, there should be no restrictions for anyone to participate in reality shows unless they are proven unsafe.
To learn how to socialize via exposure is the main reason to allow children to participate in reality shows. These kinds of programmes will have people from different walks of life, which is completely strange to what a usual school child gets exposed, so appearing in such shows helps the child to meet new people, learn to mingle, and form new friends outside the school and neighbourhood circle at a young age. The Times has reported that children participated in reality shows form more friends than those who do not. Hence, some people agree in favour of reality shows featuring children.
On the other hand, some are wary about the dangers associated with the reality shows. Most of these shows have risky tasks and games to fetch audience. At the same time, a child can neither give consent for the game it participates nor for the task it does, which means the child must bear the harm if anything goes wrong while on the show. The popular reality show aired in early 2000s “Kill The Fear”, which was exclusively for kindergarten children, was banned in 2009 when a 5-year-old boy died in pool while performing a water task. Thus, a few people do not want children to suffer for the wrong decision of participating made by their parents.
To conclude, There are two opposite opinions for allowing children to participate in reality shows. One, and also I, favour for the socializing skills a child learns from meeting new people in such shows and the other is of against the idea of featuring children in reality shows for the dangers associated with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...urhood circle at a young age. The Times has reported that children participated in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82282282282 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54609322273 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7609579785 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206851847417 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931122622355 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564894042435 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142555147011 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253603575279 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.