Nowadays the rise of consumerism has become a hot topic Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

In recent years the rise in consumers protection policies has attracted slot of attention. Policies on what to advertise to consumers, packaging and quality of what they consume. The relevance of consumerism can never be neglected
These policies enables the producers to compete and produce high quality of products for the consumers consumption because without giving the people goods with high quality they move to the next producer and there will be a decline in your earnings
There will be varieties for the consumers to choose from, and satisfy their taste producers tends to package their products in order to attract more buyers, to buy their product for example " Chivta company provides varieties for the consumers of their product by producing different types of fruit juice yearly, they produced an apple and mango last year" this tends to increase the consumers of this products yearly.
People might argue that producers will begin to produce anything of low quality in order to meet up with the increasing competition among the producers of the same product. This is true but there is always investigation done in every product to check its quality for example the " " "NAFDAC" takes care of that in Nigeria. And consumers also complian their retailers on the products that are of low quality and low taste.
In conclusion the importance of consumerism can never be overlooked because it's effectiveness tends to bring about consumption of Good products and the products of low quality and which affects health are singled out and shut down by the policy keepers.

Votes
Average: 5.1 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity of what they consume. The relevance of consumerism can never be neglected ...
^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of consumerism can never be neglected These policies enables the producers to ...
^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...roduce high quality of products for the consumers consumption because without giving the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness tends to bring about consumption of Good products and the products of low q...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about consumption of Good products and the products of low quality and which af...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18007662835 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7383836255 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 213.202404551 49.4020404114 432% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.142857143 106.682146367 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2857142857 20.7667163134 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0209244915543 0.244688304435 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140254588987 0.084324248473 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0201489904583 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0190236694147 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257489501902 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.