Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
In our contemprary society, many large enterprises have started considering formal academic qualifications as a predominant determiner in recruiting employees rather than personal qualities or life experience. There are a host of reasons contributing to this issue and personally, I believe that this is a negative phenomenon.
There are several reasons why this trend happens. First of all, employers can ensure that they can select out excellent applicants who can contribute greatly to the development of the company . It goes without saying that formal academic qualifications can assist employers to assess the intellectual ability of one person. To illustrate, by looking at the GPA of each subjects of applicants, employers can determine which subjects applicants excel at the most when they were at school. Moreover, through formal academic qualifications, employers opine that they can save resources depending on the ability of each person. This means that with excellent employees, there is no need for them to be trained skillfully anymore, they just need some basic instructions and they can do it on their own. As a result, the resources of the company will be delivered to staffs who have lower abilities.
However, I think that this phenomenon is a negative development. Firstly, life experiences and personal qualities are as important as formal acedamic qualifications. Since employers cannot assess a whole person by just focusing on their qualifications, there are other components to determine whether the employees are good or not. For example, employers have to know the unique features of applicants or whether they have life experience or not to decide whether they are suitable for the job. Secondly, many excellent applicants who have formal academic qualifications but they do not know how to express themselves and do not have any life experiences, as a consequence, this can be difficult for them to adapt to the new job. To exemplify, those employees, although brilliant, can be very slow in doing everything since they are still inexperience.
In conclusion. I believe that there are several reasons why employers prioritize academic qualifications in recruiting employees. However, life experiences and personal qualities are also indispensable parts in selecting out excellent applicants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...alities or life experience. There are a host of reasons contributing to this issue a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...reatly to the development of the company . It goes without saying that formal acad...
^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyers opine that they can save resources depending on the ability of each person....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52234636872 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23165158661 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.450476348 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.294117647 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374150917722 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113314058352 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652056214196 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228234945291 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349259099624 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.