The modern era of technology allows people to communicate without meeting each other. Unquestionably, this issue has played an essential role in most of our relationships with both bright and dark sides. Its effects and my viewpoint on this development will be shed a light in the following essay.
To begin with, the technical growth has influenced significantly in daily connections. First, with new relationships, electronic devices help us make friends with people from all over the world. Nevertheless, these friendships are quite superficial because on social network, people just show partly about themselves. Second, coming to acquaintances, it can be seen clearly that in a short period of time, smart devices give us a chance to keep contact very well. However, in a long term, it will destroy our relationships and make us feel unfamiliar to each other.
Having said that like everything else, the relation between technology and relationship also exist two faces. On the optimistic side, people can connect to their friends very quickly, which create the convenience and save more time comparing with interact directly. In particular, so useful in working and studying is it that it has been the most prevalent choice for people in recent years. By contrast, smart devices can reduce closeness and cause misunderstanding with our friends. Furthermore, it may influence on our communication skill because we cannot practice practical reaction to our partners like face to face conversation.
In a nutshell, the development of technology has improved many obstacles in connection before. Nonetheless, its plus points always go hand in hand with hassles. As a result, we should make full its benefits and minimize the harmful impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... it can be seen clearly that in a short period of time, smart devices give us a chance to keep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, well, in particular, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35144927536 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08504014477 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659420289855 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4195268199 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243424402356 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706718035405 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460764348628 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136348541039 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333605035971 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.