Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected personal relationships? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In the present era, advanced technology has altered the path people communicate with one another and it is true that technology has affected the relationship in many ways. This essay will discuss the positive and negative effects of social interaction among people.
To begin with, there are several ways in which new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interacting with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. Telephones and internet allow the business people to communicate with each other. Secondly, services like skype create new relationships among teachers and students. For instance, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country Finally, many people use social networks like Facebook to make new friends and find people to share a common interest and they interact through virtually rather than face to face.
On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. It is often seen that new-age technologies have made people less sociable. They do not interact with their family members or neighbors because they are busy interacting with virtual friends. Moreover, the practice of making relationships or friendships online is fraught with dangers because people often assume fake identities and hide facts about themselves. Teenagers are often affected by this negative trend. For instance, statistics reveal that around 8% of people hide their actual identities on Facebook. Since there is no face to face interaction, it can lead to potentially dangerous outcomes.
To conclude, although technology has certainly made it easier for people and businesses to communicate with each other but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... to communicate with each other but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53819444444 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99998191545 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6519196497 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352956880628 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1191406556 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814276037749 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22108051418 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453049970297 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.