In these days, whether to spend on building new railways or to strengthen the existing public transport is a topic which is worth of debate. Presently, some proportion of masses argue that money must be spent on constructing new railways. By contrast, others assert that public transport which already exists must be strengthened so that it could improve other issues of a city. In my opinion, I strongly believe, according to the present situation of a railway system, funds must be provided by the government so that it would improve the train journey. Also, if money is saved by upgrading the existing rails, we can solve the other issues of the country.
According to a recent government survey it is argued that, the main factor which makes the journey quicker and easier, new railway lines must be set up for fast trains. For example, a separate railway track for a metro train was erected in Hyderabad for making the transport quicker between different places. So, it is important to provide funding to set up new railway tracks for making the transport easy and quick.
On the other side of spectrum, many economists would debate that existing public transport must be improved so that large amounts of money shouldn’t be wasted. In addition to this, if we improve the already existing transport system, we can save money and spend it on other issues of the country. For instance, at my place the railway tracks were ameliorated for better transport experience and the remaining funds were given to the charity. This way, by brushing up the existing transport system we could both improve the transport system and community.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, I once again reaffirm my position that, for a better transport system and a good place to live, funds must be spent on both, constructing new railway tracks and improving the current railway transport, depending upon the requirement of a certain city, so that it will benefit the transport facilities and public as well
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94721407625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66508740857 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9339220809 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337239121013 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136027180433 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442063912139 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214397056874 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538871951648 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.