In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is debate among people regarding the use of government funds either for new railway routes or improving the current public transport system. Some people argue for the former while others believe that the latter should be considered for the utilization of a large amount of money. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and gives a clear opinion.
To begin, the railway is an effective means of transportation to connect two cities because of its celerity and pollution-free nature. Trains travel at higher speeds and without interruption unlike a public bus, which faces a lot of traffic jams. The railway route is far away from busy cities and that is useful for uninterrupted service. In addition, since most of the modern trains are electric and magnetic, so that the pollution will be mitigated fully. Hence, eradication of pollution along with the faster means to travel makes railway service effective.
However, Utilizing the fund for the improvement of existing public transportation like buses is another opinion that some people reckon. This viewpoint is based on the reason that the low budget will be required for the work and employment of drivers and co-drivers will not be at risk. Constructing a new train route will be far more expensive than ameliorating the present transportation because everything should be done from the onset and trains are far expensive than buses. Moreover, currently available buses will continuously provide service so that the jobs of bus staff will be imperishable.
In conclusion, some portion of individuals think that a new railway should be built from the available money, whereas another group of people has contradictory thoughts of improving the existing public transportation system. Nevertheless, in my opinion, though the small amount of money could be fruitful for making the present system better and the job opportunities of bus staffs would continue, the pollution-free system and faster and efficient service that train provides far outweighs the previous plan. Thus, the construction of railways holds water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...n along with the faster means to travel makes railway service effective. However, Ut...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30120481928 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90480778358 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9590106031 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331899253143 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109826145233 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844857589602 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214713032288 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078683916274 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.