One of the best ways to teach children to manage their money is to let them control their budget from an early age. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
It is a common belief that allowing kids to control their funds is not one of the most effective measures to educate them to use money from early age. Nevertheless, there is a more persuasive statement that children should be enabled to administer their finances, which can easily train them to utilize their money wisely.
To begin with, kids who are allowed to use money might become more calculating, conscious and even more intelligent. As they have to weigh decisions and understand the possible outcomes so as to avoid running out of money. Therefore, not only do children have to calculate before using money but they also need to consider what is specifically worth buying. Japanese children, for example, are given allowance since they are young and they have to start saving in order to expend on their personal stuff. As a result, kids gradually become more calculating and conscious in controlling their budget as well as beware of the importance of cash.
On top of that, children well-evaluate money’s value once they know it is not easily to have. Should kids desire for possessing an amount of allowance from their parents, they are required to make their contribution to household chores under parents’control. Furthermore, paying children based on the chores they do educate them that money is not given but earned to them. According to a recent survey, kids who make contribution to work with a view to earning money are keen on working. Hence, kids are aware of the value of money and labor.
To sum up, allowing children to stick to their budget since early age educates them to be more calculating and beware of the importance of money and working. For these reasons, I firmly allege that letting kids handle their finances is one of the most effective methods to train them to utilize their money wisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ns and understand the possible outcomes so as to avoid running out of money. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90675241158 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70083830665 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0336387601 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3327576617 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122750479978 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073116316148 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236445243342 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684762392584 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.