Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face-to-face education soon. Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable. Discuss both views and give your opnion.
Indeed, technology has been improved as compared to the past era by which it also impacts on the way of learning, where a group of people thinks that e-learning will replace other ways of learning while remain individuals claim that traditional way of education is more beneficial over any other way of learning and it is irreplaceable.
To commence with, there are many reasons why people think that e-learning has more advantageous. Firstly, it is the quick source of information in which pupils can easily find the solutions to their doubts with the help of e-education due to this they gain up-to-date knowledge which helps them to compete in the competitive era. Secondly, it is a time-saver, learners can get knowledge within no time and utilize their extra time to enjoy themselves from their busy schedule.
On the other hand, traditional way of learning has their own merits. It gives rise to many qualities in the individuals because when they work in a group they face different things and it leads to their experience and they learn cooperation, discipline, honesty and punctuality which nurture their personality. Additionally, some occupations require practical knowledge such as the medical field and teaching so theoretical knowledge is not applicable for these. Along with it, classrooms have a comfortable environment for learning pupils to easily concentrate on their tasks.
In my opinion, traditional education has more advantages than e-learning, individuals learn other qualities and moral values along with education which helps them to become a good personality in the public.
In conclusion, it can be asserted that both ways of learning have their own importance but the traditional way of education never be replaced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ing will replace other ways of learning while remain individuals claim that tradition...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
... be asserted that both ways of learning have their own importance but the traditiona...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30107526882 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00860565193 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4013088893 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.9 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247260299902 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976685628231 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735207500152 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147486058754 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589732864408 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.