ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health an on society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There has been a significant sore in the ownership of cell phones in cutting-edge although dangerous consequences on our world and physical well-being. However, it is said that city officials should impose restriction to mobile phone usage and only allow to those who need for their make a living.
There are number of reasons in favour of restriction of phone usage. To commence with, It is argued that mobile phones are most popular amongst younger people. Hence, It may affect in brain development mostly in children and teenagers due to spending extended hours using it. Furthermore, It has been claimed that a single carelessness of phone usage might have disastours damage since phones’ radio waves emit harmgful frequency while travelling by plane or emergency room in hospitals. Finally, It generally agreed that cell phones may affect our health because nowadays extensive and ugly antennas has been established on most buildings which not far from most residential area.
On the other hand, There are plethora of arguments in against of ownership of mobile phone. Firstly, It is widely believed that it gives sens of security. A person, for example, may stuck many far miles from city center due to his car breakdown. Subsequently, He may use mobile phone to call rescue team. Secondly, It is pointed out that public telephones are not working due to many people may stuck in many places and existing ones are vandalized. Finally, It is said that there is no concret proof that mobile phones affects our health. So, it should not be restricted and people are free to use it since it is their life.
To recapitulate , Although there are number of reasons are in favour of ownership of cell phones, the arguments against it far outweigh. Personally, I believe that authorities should not restrict the use of mobile phones since it is essientails to have in any emergency situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nce it is their life. To recapitulate , Although there are number of reasons ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03174603175 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73216016492 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4064589193 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321524605342 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106867975064 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711856091468 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205749888171 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385484260917 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.