Parents of obese children should not be punished for making their children fat.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that parents should penalize their obese offsprings due to their weight. I disagree with the statement because the punishment is not a proper solution to the obesity problem. Instead of penalizing their children parent should have to focus on their diet and provide sufficient sports facilities. Punishment usually has a negative impact on one's life as it results in immorality and impairs their cognitive, communicative and sociable traits.
Firstly, obesity in children prevails due to lack of proper diet management. Mothers and Fathers should have to ensure proper food for their children, who are gaining weight, to tackle the problem of obesity instead of punishing their children. Panlization is harmful because it creates a gap between parents and children and their siblings. As a result, they become less sociable. Sometimes punishment boots negative characteristics in children, so that, they careless about their obesity problem.
Secondly, It is believed that the best way to lose weight is to exercise which is usually achieved by different sports activities. Sports activities not only help children to relinquish their fat but also ensure a healthy life. Occasionally, to penalise obese kids causes the psychological and health problems. Because of that children mostly undergo severe stresses and feel insecure at their homes.
To sum up, it is better to encourage fatty pupils to exercise and change their food habits, as both methods tackle problem positively. Moreover, proper diet and doing physical activities promote healthy lifestyle among the children and enhances their moral in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esses and feel insecure at their homes. To sum up, it is better to encourage fat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48221343874 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78347318587 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3514841045 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407153519167 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136278430495 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912857587037 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241922580754 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10131172826 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.