Parents, usually mothers, stay at home to look after their families. People believe that for this they should receive a salary from the government. Do you agree or disagree and why?
In this modern era, both of men and women are engaged in working outsides. But it is seen that especially womens who remain at house for taking after her families. Moreover, some people think that these married female should receive a financial help from the government. I strongly agree with the statement and I believe that this step is necessary to build to make women independent and it also has great impact in our society.
Women will become no more burden in the family if they are provided money from government. They can start up a business besides looking after their families. In this way, they can contribute some money in their family by staying at home. For instance, in Japan , house wives are contributing in their countries economy by making home business at home and also able to look after their family properly. So, day by day womens are becoming self dependent.
Furthermore, mothers can feed up their childs properly. If poor mothers are paid money, they can buy her childrens essential food products and also contribute the money to their childs education. Consequently, they can create a better future for their childs and also it is a huge impact on our countries education. For example, in Korea, as government are paying money to mothers , womens can contribute that money to their childs health and educational expenditures which has brought a tremendous flourishment of literacy in Korean education for the last 10 years.
In conclusion, I think providing money to mothers who stay at home for looking after their families can have tremendous benefits of mass educational literacy of mass people and also on economical development in any country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... staying at home. For instance, in Japan , house wives are contributing in their c...
^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s government are paying money to mothers , womens can contribute that money to the...
^^
Line 11, column 186, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nal literacy of mass people and also on economical development in any country.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03214285714 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69601745827 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1701541561 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288767971255 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10819504484 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680367724168 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185418900502 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686786792452 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.