Technological breakthrough in this century has tremendously affected the lifestyle of people. Nevertheless, it changed the way people with white collared jobs too. A great deal of comfort is achieved by most of the employed population through the advancement of internet in their smartphones, laptops and other smart devices. However, there are few shortcomings in the working environment and the etiquettes followed. It has indeed transformed the people from an active itinerant to a enervated couch potato in most of the cases.
People have started to work smartly with internet around. The service provided through Wi-Fi and advanced satellite connections have made the impossible in to a working marvel. Employees are now able to harness most of the advantages through conducting meetings virtually; show productiveness whenever they are comfortable; risk of travelling through pollution; avoid stress and tensions for marking their access cards in office and so many other benefits. They are able to extend their working hours for the day and earn extras for their productivity. Staying at home helps them to eat healthy home made cuisines and easily keeps a check on the food they consume. Since, a pantry or a cafeteria meeting with colleagues in office go hand in hand with unhealthy eating habits, having a healthy meal has become the norm of their life. With frequent breaks and relaxation in the middle of the work, yet they are able to meet their deadlines within the stipulated time. Thus, stretching themselves amidst their tight schedule has a good impact on the usual ergonomics to be followed at workplace.
However, spending most of the time only through a virtual connection may affect the social relationships with colleagues. Communication can be a major barrier in hindering the agenda for the day. Sometimes, certain information can be misconstrued by the members working from home and they are subjected to work with the wrong inputs. Consequently, this can affect the timeframe spent on a particular module to be completed. Certainly, employer and employee relationship can be devastated in this case. Though people find comfort in work from home option, it is certain that extroverts will miss the working ambiance; colleague's participation; social relationship building; fun at workplace; mockeries and chortles; emotional attachment etc.
To conclude, selecting an workplace depends upon the people's basic character. An introvert and reticent person would always prefer to avoid socializing. He may be happy with the environment at home. Majority of the gregarious natured population rush to the office in order to meet new people and have a fun frolic work environment. However, world is changing exponentially and people can expect a work station completely installed at home.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the people from an active itinerant to a enervated couch potato in most of the c...
^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and chortles; emotional attachment etc. To conclude, selecting an workplace depe...
^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ttachment etc. To conclude, selecting an workplace depends upon the peoples basi...
^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k station completely installed at home.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36199095023 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00667752575 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8367506781 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278469248088 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782853032833 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601798907701 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172673724989 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115286605599 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.