People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world, what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
It is true that humans seem to be more distant from the natural world. There is a range of reasons for this, and several measures should be taken to tackle the issue.
On the one hand, technological advancements have increasingly driven people’s attention away from nature. Mobile phones and other gadgets have been introduced in people’s daily lives and seem to consume most of their free time. Therefore, when being off-work, people no longer engage with the natural world in a way that the previous generation did, and just stay indoors and spend their time on technology instead. Moreover, owing to developments in technology and the Internet, work is no longer restricted to the office space, leaving people busy even when returning home or on vacation. Therefore, leisure time has become a rarity and people have little chance to appreciate the world around them.
To improve people’s understanding of Mother Nature, parks and other green spaces should be well invested and promoted. When these natural places become more attractive, they will more likely to draw people to visit and learn more about them. Besides, parents should guide their children towards a life of more contact with nature. This could be done by arranging outings to a forest or lake rather than staying in resorts with limited contact with the outside world.
In conclusion, improvements in technology are the main culprit in keeping many people in the dark about the natural world. To resolve the situation, the government should make parks more appealing to the general public, and families should prioritize visits to the natural world over other forms of vacation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...should make parks more appealing to the general public, and families should prioritize visits ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13703703704 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57296538874 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8866295746 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37291810894 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130338305158 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825139845856 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220248226499 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038399415207 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.