People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, advanced technology has greatly benefited people by its convenience and comfort to work and live in different parts of the world. From my perspective, while there are certain drawbacks regarding this tendency, I believe that its benefits would be predominant.
The main reason, in which these developments would pose a problem to people's lives, is due to the cost. It means that even though local citizens have a privilege to approach advanced transportation, they would find it extremely difficult to cover their bills, especially they are living paycheck to paycheck. Another disadvantage is that it is due to its accessibility. Advanced communication technology is becoming more sophisticated and complicated, which might prevent people, especially those are elderly, to interact with their friends, relatives, or even their colleagues. Perhaps, these technologies are designed for the young generation to work more effectively, but it would take a heavy toll on people, who are not with many years of experience and expertise, to utilize.
However, alongside the influence of these disadvantages, I believe that we should not dismiss its benefits because they play an integral role in our lives. First, thanks to the evolution of mass transportation, place-to-place journeys become easier than ever, especially it just a matter of hours. For instance, high-speed trains, using electromagnets, are less likely to encounter weather-related delays. This example wants to indicate that it is beneficial to not only reduce the time that most people spend on daily travel but also help them to experience a more decent standard of living. Besides, when it comes to communication, workers could take advantage of such applications as Skype or Viber to communicate with their co-workers or even have a private meeting. Although these devices might require them to have a basic understanding, they would facilitate people to work regardless of geographical barriers.
In conclusion, despite the fact that people could face minor problems related to advanced technology communication and transportation, I think that the benefits could have a significant influence on people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53571428571 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25137333621 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5332385327 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225863900511 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708420157056 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506719291789 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131456761502 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216991278418 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.