It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
The tendency of traveling to distant locations such as the South Pole is increasingly prevalent among scientists and tourists thanks to the advancement of technology. From my perspective, while there are certain benefits regarding this development, its drawbacks should not be dismissed.
Indeed, advanced technology has made this kind of travel possible for both tourists and scientists in recent years. The main benefit of this development is to bring a new and unique feeling to people because these places are relatively far from cities and metropolises and might not have been discovered previously. For example, Antarctica, where is located in the South Pole and has an extreme environment, rarely attract much people’s attention. However, by taking advantage of using highly specialized equipment, people could discover this place by themselves. Therefore, they would experience a sense of satisfaction as they could follow their hobby, which is to set foot in these places.
However, apart from the beneficial influence expressed above, I believe that people should not ignore its disadvantages even though the technology is supportive to some extent. The history of extreme activities such as traveling to distant places has witnessed many heart-wrenching accidents, which occurred to the unfortunate participants, even the ones who have many years of experience and expertise. These accidents commonly include a range of factors such as malfunctioning gears, mistaken operation, and physical condition issues. For instance, if people travel to Antarctica and are not fully equipped with proper gears, it would increase the risk of dangers. Besides, it is also because activities taken part in the remote natural environment are often have limited medical care, which people may find it extremely difficult to deal with their emergencies.
In conclusion, although it is currently possible for people to take a trip to remote natural locations for exploration, I believe that people should be careful because of the mentioned underlying drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61708860759 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05178001176 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3342509109 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275247382038 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876244423601 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726907118604 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160897228373 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445563132515 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.